000 03518nam a2200373Ia 4500
000 04050nam a22004095i 4500
001 978-3-031-26809-0
003 DE-He213
005 20240319120858.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 230731s2023 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031268090
_9978-3-031-26809-0
082 _a6.35
100 _aSproat, Richard.
_931389
245 _aSymbols
_cby Richard Sproat.
_h[electronic resource] :
250 _a1st ed. 2023.
260 _aCham
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland
_c2023
300 _aXIII, 235 p. 91 illus., 57 illus. in color.
_bonline resource.
520 _aFor millennia humans have used visible marks to communicate information. Modern examples of conventional graphical symbols include written language, and non-linguistic symbol systems such as mathematical symbology or traffic signs. The latter kinds of symbols convey information without reference to language. This book presents the first systematic study of graphical symbol systems, including a history of graphical symbols from the Paleolithic onwards, a taxonomy of non-linguistic systems - systems that are not tied to spoken language - and a survey of more than 25 such systems. One important feature of many non-linguistic systems is that, as in written language, symbols may be combined into complex "messages" if the information the system represents is itself complex. To illustrate, the author presents an in-depth comparison of two systems that had very similar functions, but very different structure: European heraldry and Japanese kamon. Writing first appeared in Mesopotamia about 5,000 years ago and is believed to have evolved from a previous non-linguistic accounting system. The exact mechanism is unknown, but crucial was the discovery that symbols can represent the sounds of words, not just the meanings. The book presents a novel neurologically-inspired hypothesis that writing evolved in an institutional context in which symbols were "dictated", thus driving an association between symbol and sound, and provides a computational simulation to support this hypothesis. The author further discusses some common fallacies about writing and non-linguistic systems, and how these relate to widely cited claims about statistical "evidence" for one or another system being writing. The book ends with some thoughts about the future of graphical symbol systems. The intended audience includes students, researchers, lecturers, professionals and scientists from fields like Natural Language Processing, Machine Learning, Archaeology and Semiotics, as well as general readers interested in language and/or writing systems and symbol systems. Richard Sproat is a Research Scientist at Google working on Deep Learning. He has a long-standing interest in writing systems and other graphical symbol systems.
650 _aComputational linguistics.
_931390
650 _aComputational Linguistics.
_931391
650 _aComputer Application in Social and Behavioral Sciences.
_931392
650 _aComputer Modelling.
_931393
650 _aComputer simulation.
_931394
650 _aDigital humanities.
_931395
650 _aDigital Humanities.
_931396
650 _aMachine learning.
_931397
650 _aMachine Learning.
_931398
650 _aNatural language processing (Computer science).
_931399
650 _aNatural Language Processing (NLP).
_931400
650 _aSocial sciences
_931401
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26809-0
942 _cEBK
_2ddc
999 _c15210
_d15210